THE HOMONATOR
Years before Brandy Chastain ripped her soccer jersey off and paraded her guns at the Women's World Cup, Linda Hamilton was showing off her own assault muscles in "Terminator Two: Judgment Day."
I was raised Catholic, but before I saw Hamilton in T2 I had never actually used the words "Holy Mary, Mother of God!"
T2 is one of my favorite films, not just because Linda Hamilton is a sexy stud, and not just because it's one of the best action movies ever made, but because it's central point is that the best thing about people is not their scientific innovations or their impressive arsenals or even their Eiffel Towers or King Lears or Mona Lisas, but their ability to love.
Like, say you're an Einstein working on a Doomsday Machine to wipe out your country's enemy, who probably has a different skin color/religion from you, or, if your enemy is an alien species, gigantic ears and a bony forehead. Your research is hailed as a triumph of science and the pinnacle of human intellect, but then, as you are driving to your nuclear lab, you see a pretty girl picking flowers (or polishing her AK47) and you fall in love and forget about your Doomsday Device.
This is what Oscar Wilde meant by "The advantage of the emotions is that they lead us astray."
The tragedy of the Terminator, played by Arnold Schwarzenegger, is that he has no emotions to lead him astray.
He is a machine. He has intellect, but no heart, like a Space Age Tin Man. But unlike the Tin Man, Arnold doesn't want a heart. A heart would interfere with his job, which is to save the human race.
When a teenager asks him whether he's afraid of dying, Arnold is baffled and says no: "I have to stay functional until my mission is complete."
Human emotion does not compute with the Terminator.
When the teenager sheds tears, he asks, "What's wrong with your eyes?"
When the same teen tells him, "You just can't go around killing people," he asks, "Why?" The teen: "What do you mean 'why'? Because you can't." The Terminator: "Why?" (And there are plenty of times in the movie where this seems like a perfectly valid question).
So the Terminator is tragic, but not a tragic hero.
Hamilton, not Schwarzenegger, is the hero of T2. They both rid the world of bad guys, but Hamilton feels pain and anger and vengeance and sorrow while doing it. The genius of the movie is that she has trained herself — her body, her mind — to be more like a machine: focused on a mission, not led astray by emotion. She can drive a ballpoint pen through a dude's kneecap without batting an eyelash. But she ultimately fails in her mission to be a machine, and it's a failure that saves the day.
Her moral outrage is the film's fuel: "Fucking men like you built the hydrogen bomb. Men like you thought it up. You think you're so creative. You don't know what it's like to really create something; to create a life; to feel it growing inside you. All you know how to create is death..." (One of the many comic moments in the film is when her young son interrupts this monologue with "Mom! We need to be a little more constructive here, okay?")
So Hamilton the human is the hero, but Arnold the machine gets the choicest line: "The more contact I have with humans, the more I learn."
It doesn't have the zip of "Hasta la vista, baby!" and "I'll be back," the two most oft-quoted T2 lines, but it's the one that deserves to be remembered. Because it's the point of the film.
And it came back to me earlier this week during an e-mail conversation with Erin. I'll reprint my first e-mail to her and summarize the rest:
OK, I got to tell you this thing that happened at dinner last night. I was just trying not to think about it today (I might blog about it when I'm less upset). But I was asking my stepmom and dad about various relatives, how they're doing, etc., and my dad's little brother Danny came up in the conversation. He was diagnosed a long time ago with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. So I was asking questions about him, how he came to be diagnosed, etc., because I was a kid when all of that happened, and I would imagine that he did not get much support, knowing my family. So I was interested in his life and what it was like, etc., and I was asking some pretty pointed questions. Then my stepmom seemed very interested in the topic, and she said, "You know, I've always wondered, with Tim being Danny's twin and Tim going gay (her exact words), and Danny being manic-depressive if maybe something bad happened when Eileen was pregnant, if something was damaged, or a chromosome dropped or something." I just looked down at my plate. I couldn't look at her because I knew I would cry if I tried to say anything. So I didn't say anything. And my dad didn't say anything. And now I feel ashamed for letting her get away with that.
So that upset me, the idea that I'm damaged goods or mentally ill. And I told Erin that I was going to kill my stepmom. And she said, "You just can't go around killing people," and I said, "Why?" And she said: "What do you mean 'why'? Because you can't." And I said: "Why?"
No, wait. I'm misremembering that.
What Erin actually said was that my stepmom clearly wasn't thinking and was suffering some sort of vast disconnect between screwed-up notions of gayness put into her head by society and the gay person sitting right in front of her whom she shows all evidence of loving and accepting. I have heard Erin make this excuse for others before — people who operate on stereotypes in lieu of experience, people who have certain notions about gays or blacks or whatever simply because they have never been around gays or blacks or whatever. And she's totally right. These people are not evil; they're just inexperienced. Their CPU's have been poorly programmed. I shouldn't get mad or hurt or homicidal. I should just be more gay. So they don't forget whom they're dealing with.
In "T4: The Homonators," a script George and I are writing, the thematic line is going to be "The more contact I have with gay humans, the more I learn."
But probably the line everyone will remember will be "Hasta la vista, Mary!"
59 Comments:
"T4: The Homonators -- Nonjudgmental Day" could also be about "The more contact I have with gay humans, the more I learn to love."
You set a shining example, love.
"The unknown future rolls toward us. I face it, for the first time, with a sense of hope. Because if a machine, a Terminator, can learn the value of human life, maybe we can too."
Damn straight, Hamilton was the hero. She starts the film with the belief of "no future," but learns to hope in the end.
I think everyone could use more hope in there lives. I know I can.
Yes, you should be more gay. I think I will be, too. That reminds me of a few things that I probably shouldn't say in public. Maybe I'll tell you privately.
By the way, why don't people like me? Is it because they have something against left-handed people? Weirdos? Annoying people? Singers? Fat people? People whose legs are too short for their height? I need to figure it out so I can be more of whatever it is when I'm experiencing discrimination.
"T4: The Homonators — Nonjudmental Day"!
Why didn't I think of that? That's brilliant, G!
Yeah, really gay it up, kc. I would like to see that.
Linda Hamilton really rocked the idea of the female body when that photo came out. I know that's when I bought into the high-protein, lifting weights routine. I wish that were more the standard than these skinny Eastern European girls with their eyes on the sides of their faces. (Of course, clothes do hang beautifully on them.)
(Needless to say that in the last 12 or so years, I abandoned the high-protein, weight-lifting regime. But the photo is still inspiring. It says, "I can fucking take care of myself.")
You bought into the workout regimen when T2 came out? That would have been in 1991? See, I don't remember any hype about Linda Hamilton. Seems like it was all about Arnold and all the catchy soundbites. And I didn't actually see the movie until a year or so later when it came out on video. I bought the video for Steve because he was a huge sci-fi fan and he really liked Arnold (so did I) in "The Running Man," which is based on a Stephen King novel, I think, and "Total Recall," which is based on a Philip K. Dick short story. Anyway, Steve liked T2 and tried to get me to watch it, but I wasn't a big sci-fi fan, so I turned him down, but he assured me I'd like it, and so I watched it, and that's the first thing I knew about Linda Hamilton or that the hero of the film was a woman. It's a fantastic movie.
I know it isn't the same thing, but somebody now on leave was making a remark about fat people the other day and then suddenly said, "I ... I shouldn't say anything else."
Amazing.
What?! She did? What was she getting at?
Well, all the women's mags (Allure, Vogue, etc.) that you probably weren't reading went into orbit over the muscular female physique.
I do like "Total Recall."
I can't remember the context of the "fat" conversation, only that it was the same thing, she wasn't being deliberately rude, just stuck her foot in her mouth.
"Total Recall." Yeah. But do you like T2? Tell the truth. I promise I probably won't get mad.
I don't remember "T2" very much -- I remember LH getting somebody out of a hospital, but I don't know whether I saw the whole thing. I feel like I saw part of "T3," with the teen kid. But maybe that was "T2."
She got HERSELF out of the hospital. They threw her in the loony bin because she knew about the Terminators and they said she was delusional.
We'll have to find six hours sometime and watch all the 3 T's. She's in the first one (not buff yet), but not in the third, although the third features a female Terminator.
I have also been wanting to see the Mad Max trilogy again.
One thing I liked about T2 is that the terminator is exactly the same machine as in T1 but just reprogrammed to help Hamilton instead of destroy her. Not only has she become a very different person since the last time she encountered the machine, but she now has to confront her deep-seated fear and hatred of this machine if she is to use it to survive. The standard premise of a science fiction movie is to have machines built as helpers betray our trust and become evil. This happened in T1. But can the trust ever be restored? That is one of the themes in T2.
I’ll shoot your T4 for you as long as it doesn’t have Arnold in it. He has a lot on his plate right now and seems to be having trouble eating it.
I remember that a lot was made of Linda Hamilton buffing up for the role. It shocked a lot of people, but I thought it was pretty cool; it really fit the character.
I liked T2 a lot, seeing it three times in the theaters the first two weeks it came out. But now I like the original better. I have a harder time getting past the paradox of T2, which they tried to fix in T3 -- that movie was not so good.
What do you see as the paradox in T2? (I also really liked T1. T3 was fun to watch, but it was not mesmerizing and brilliant like T2.)
In T2, if they stop Judgment Day, then Reese never gets sent back in time and John Conner is never born. Basically, none of ever happens.
You're right, George, but fortunately, movies are about the suspension of reality, so I can forgive that little lapse in logic to appreciate this most incredible flick. Like you (in fact, probably in the same theater as you), I saw T2 three or four times right after its release. I was taking a film noir class at the time and was heavily into such classics as "Blade Runner," and I found a lot of reasons to see T2 through a "noir scope." By the way, for those of you who might be feeling a little old, Edward Furlong, the affable teen in T2, will turn 29 on Wednesday. :)
Yeah, don't get me wrong; I still like T2 quite a bit -- as kc says, it's an excellent action flick with some depth to it. I just find beauty in the simplicity of the first movie.
And, Sharon, all three times I saw T2 it was in the old Village 6 in Brookhaven. We probably were in the same theater.
Sharon, I LOVE "Blade Runner." As I said, I'm not a big sci-fi fan, but that is a beautiful movie.
Have you seen "Brazil"?
Aahhhh ... "Brazil"! I told DW earlier how when I was in film school I wanted to do movies like Terry Gilliam's, and that is my favorite of his.
I liked "Brazil," but probably not as much as "Blade Runner" and definitely not as much as a film called "Metropolis" that you probably haven't seen. A German guy named Fritz Lang did it in 1927, and it's WONDERFUL!! Full of dark, futuristic doom but with a lovely maiden who represents the hope of redemption for the world. Giorgio Moroder "remade" Lang's film in 1984, tinting frames, adding some frames from the original that had been lost, adding a rock (!!) soundtrack and inserting some intertitles to further the narrative. There's a great deal of controversy in the film world about what Morodor did, but it's really an interesting treatment if you view it that way instead of as Moroder trying to redo Lang. If you haven't seen either of these, I strongly encourage you to look for them. They might be difficult to find, but they're WELL worth the effort.
Well, you can get “Metropolis” from Netflix and probably any store that has much of an arthouse/foreign collection—it is very famous. I’ve not seen that recreation you mention.
If I remember this right, there was a strike during the making of “Blade Runner” and they couldn’t start shooting? So they spent the time adding ever more and more detail to those wonderfully rich sets? A very beautifully shot film however they got there. Ridley Scott started out with several distinctive and impressive movies, but his later work hasn’t interested me near as much. What happened to him?
Don’t sell “Brazil” short—it is a very rich film. I told George that this is probably the movie I have seen the most times since it was one of the first that I had on VHS tape and it has enough depth to be watched over and over. “Blade Runner” is prettier, but overall “Brazil” is the much stronger movie. And it is very tightly constructed with even the sight gags having a major role to play.
Sharon, I have never actually seen Metropolis, but I need to. I read recently that it was the most expensive silent film ever made. I'm sure Liberty Hall has it. I'll check it out.
dw (may I call you that?), I don't know what has happened to Ridley Scott, but I agree with you entirely about his more recent work. Really disappointing. You are right about the strike during the filming of "Blade Runner" and the resulting bonus visually. I finally got around to watching Scott's director's cut of "BR" a few years back, and for the most part, I didn't prefer it to the widely released version. It seemed muddier and disjointed to me. Also, I didn't say I don't like "Brazil." I think it's a great film. I think it's the type of film that improves with repeat viewings at different points in one's life. I hesitate to say this in a public forum, lest I be flogged and dismissed as obviously uneducated, but the only film I've approached repeatedly and never found much value in is Robert Altman's "Nashville." It's the one where he played with sound, and it drove me crazy. I started it on three occasions without being able to finish it. I finished it on the fourth viewing (several years later), and still had to ask myself why I had bothered. One of my best friends -- who is my former film professor -- tells me that "Nashville" is one of the best films ever made. She has learned to tolerate my respectful disagreement, however. :)
Sharon, you should do this film-rating thing that DW and George are doing. I haven't gotten to it yet. But have George tell you about it.
Kim, having spoken to George, I think I shall do the film rating thing. I love that about Netflix. I rate lots of movies there. By the way, I guess we know now who's better to work with -- George is leaving me MUCH sooner than he left you. :(
George stinks, I know.
If it's any consolation, Sharon, you didn't just drive him out of his present job; you drove him out of the profession. Way to go.
I can't wait until he's a nurse, though. When he's a nurse, he's going to be my doctor. I already have a toenail I need him to examine. George, have you taken the toe-ology class yet?
I always have tried to outdo you, ya know. But I'm not sure you should go around publicizing the fact that you want to play doctor with George. Kinda ruins your rep as a lesbian, dontchathink? Besides, I speak from experience when I say that it's really awkward to be friends with your doctor (well, your gynecologist, at least). You're always thinking, "When she thinks about me, what part does she see?"
Sharon, what are you talking about? What was that you called me a few weeks back -- "a self-respecting lesbian"?
If anything, I would give kc more cred.
But as a nurse, I would be a professional. We'd work out something in trade -- haircuts for fixin' toes.
Lot of damn good this "reputation as a lesbian" is doing me. Last time I got any action was .... well, let's see ... I'd say last summer, but George claims trips to the gynecologist don't count.
I guess it would depend on how vigorously she searched for your cervix.
Also, Sharon, I will also confess that I am not a big Robert Altman fan. I don't see what all the fuss is about. I liked "The Player" a lot, but "M.A.S.H." did not thrill me, nor did "Short Cuts." I think he suffers from lack of likeable characters (not like as in like, but like as in I give a shit what happens to this person.)
All I ever get at the gynecologist is pain. Ask me sometime about how an endometrial biopsy feels. I definitely don't confuse the gyno with "action." Besides, Kim, it's like I keep tellin' ya -- move to Tulsa, and I'll make sure that you get some action. Lots of lonely lesbos here.
I don't love Robert Altman either. "Nashville" is my least favorite, but then again, I would be hard-pressed to pick a favorite. I agree with you about the lack of likeable characters. If I can't invest myself enough to hope that they don't get screwedd over (worse: I find myself hoping that they do, in fact, get screwed over), what's the point?
Thanks, hon. Nothing says "good times" like "lots of lonely lesbos."
Well good for you Sharon. “Nashville” is one of those icons of filmmaking that get talked about so much that it might be hard to maintain your own—or at least own up to your own—opinion. I do like the movie (and Altman more generally) but I can see why you might not. “Mash” is a movie that I used to think highly of but not anymore. George and I are creating lists of movies to rewatch on that site Filmaffinity. I’ve put “Shortcuts” on my rewatch list after one of my film bloggers talked about it recently, but I cannot remember it clearly enough to know if it is really as good as I think. The most enjoyable Altman is probably “The Player” opening as it does with that fun really long and complex shot.
And speaking of Filmaffinity, yes, it would be cool to have you there. By trading usernames, you can add people to your “friends” list and see their ratings and the lists they create. So if you do sign up, let me and George know your name so we can add you to our friends files. Two things I like about the site are first, the obvious one that it matches you up with like-minded people who are then a good source of titles for what to watch. But second, I found it very interesting to go through a thousand and some titles and try to decide what I thought about the movies some of which I saw a very long time ago. Hence the rewatch list.
KC, lonely lesbos are better than no lesbos, right? But if you prefer, I can find you some that you'll have to fight for.
I had a dream last night (a result, I assume, of a lot of people around here leaving the paper and/or changing jobs)that my boss' job became available but that the higher-ups gave it to a guy I work with rather than me and that I was so upset that I quit. Maybe I can find a way to blame my bad dream on George's leaving and your lack of interest in coming back here.
DW, thanks so much for the kind words about me being "good enough, strong enough ... " And also for reminding me about "The Player," which I never saw despite my best intentions. I'll get that one right away and give Altman another chance. :) I ran out of time last night to look at Filmaffinity, but I'll sign up real soon and let you and George know my info.
Filmaffinity?! I'm signing up!
KC, I went to the gyno the first time pure, and it hurt so much I kind of fainted. Or anyway, I had to lie down and my blood pressure was something over 40.
I haven't registered yet, but it looks like "Airplane 2" had five stars.
cl, pure?
hehe
I was quite impure the first time.
George, were you pure or impure the first time you went?
Depends ... do you mean before I went or after?
You people talk about nothing but lonely lesbos, gynecology, and movies. Can't you find a topic that I'm interested in?
After you see , kc, you'll have to blog about barbershop again. Those four guys (especially Aussie John, the lead) are beautiful boys who sing beautifully.
(Dammit, I had to look up gynecology. What the hell's the good in taking Ancient Greek if you can't even spell gynecology after four semesters?)
Whoops! Screwed up the html. The underlined part above is supposed to say "Realtime," which is the name of the barbershop quartet I was referring to.
By the way, some friends of mine are thinking about starting a quartet called "Outside Straight."
Yes, the name refers to sexual orientation and where the various members of the quartet stand. As in almost all quartets, the bass and lead stand in the middle, and this particular bass and lead are gay.
The straight guys were hoping I would join (replacing the lead) so they'd have a majority of the votes when it came to voting on quartet activities. (They wouldn't want to do anything too gay, ya know. Like sing barbershop.)
I guess if I joined, they'd have to change the name from "Outside Straight" to something like "Gay Bass." Oh, be sure to pronounce "Bass" with a long a sound. It isn't a reference to Lance Bass or to a fish.
Ben, I took two years of Latin in high school and three more in college and I still can't read my gynecologist's writing. I feel your pain.
If you tried pronouncing bass with a short a, you could sing songs such as "Under the Sea," "Caribbean Queen" and "Surfin' USA." Tee hee.
I have a fabulous gyno. I was pure (in a way) the first time I went, but it didn't hurt. I've been to a couple of butchers since then, though. Now I'm back with my original cervix-scraper.
Sharon, that's hilarious.
I'd like to go on record as saying all women are pure, always.
Erin, thanks. But I hope it doesn't sound like I disrespect barbershop quartetting. I don't. i like it, in fact.
KC, ALL women?? I've known some who weren't pure. Pure evil, maybe.
I just really hate that a lot is made of women's virginity, like it's some sort of defining feature. Like the insertion of the male organ fundamentally changes or defines her somehow, like it's some big event. Now she's not pure anymore. Or now she's a woman. Her bloom is off once she is "deflowered." It's so gross. Especially men who are really into being a girl's "first." I'm not saying anyone here buys that, but the thought of it nauseates me.
I don't disagree with you. I was just being a smartass. Personally, I think everyone should have sex with at least a few people before they even think about being monogamous. I don't believe that the entire success of a relationship hangs on the balance of good sex, but in the same way that experience makes a person a better employee ...
Sharon, I didn't think you were making fun of barbershop, and I wouldn't be offended even if you did. I've always been one to poke fun at the hobby while being completely obsessed with it.
The fifth place chorus at the international barbershop convention this year dressed as fish in the sea. Most of them had giant foam fish over their heads and long, flowing light-blue gowns on. The director had a full-body starfish costume on, several members who weren't as mobile (in wheelchairs, etc.) were the "choral reef," and two members were turtles who did certain choreography at 1/4 speed.
Yes, they sang a few bass jokes. As well as the line "son of a fish" (which is actually quite funny-sounding out loud). And the Jaws theme, complete with a prop skeletalized fish (the same size as the fish on their heads).
It was almost unbearably entertaining.
The chorus is based in Greendale, Wisconsin, and they have pictures of the fish chorus on their .
Gosh darnit, another messed up link. That underlined period was supposed to say "website." If you want to see the website, either click on the damn underlined period or just type the address into your browser: www.mve.org.
OH MY GOD. Those photos are HILARIOUS!!! KC, maybe you could photoshop George's face onto the starfish.
I bet NONE of those dudes are straight. I wore some pretty goofy costumes in marching band, but I was never a fish.
Hey, maybe Mel Gibson could join them, and they could sing "Finding Schlomo"!
Of course, neither "Finding Nemo" nor "Finding Schlomo" is a song. I should have said it this way:
Hey, maybe they could get walk-on roles in Mel Gibson's next film, "Finding Schlomo."
There. That's better. I am an editor, after all.
B, I hope there are costumes in St. Joe, beyond the regular penguin suits.
KC, "pure" was just a euphemism. Per Sharon's suggestion, I was more "pure evil" until I finally got some and lightened up.
KC, Realtime often tries to look slightly like a modern Rat Pack, so they end up wearing cool black-and-white outfits that don't match in cut or specific style, just in overall feel.
But they also often wear suits.
And I don't know what all else will be on the show. I think the Voices of America chorus is performing, and they sometimes do fun costuming -- I've seen them dress as football players, homeless people, and barefoot little boys. But they often wear suits or tuxes.
This is a very nice post all around.
Post a Comment
<< Home